Wikipedia reliable source
Essay About Is Wikipedia A Reliable Source - Download as a PDF or view online for freeThe following tips will help you tell a good source from one that’s biased, outdated, or inaccurate: 1. Check the domain name. Look at the three letters at the end of the site’s domain name, such as “edu” (educational), “gov” (government), “org” (nonprofit), and “com” (commercial). Generally, .edu and .gov websites are ...
Did you know?
History. Founded in 1768, The Encyclopedia Britannica is a general knowledge English-language encyclopedia. It is written by about 100 full-time editors and more than 4,000 contributors, including 110 Nobel Prize winners and five American presidents. The 2010 version of the 15th edition, which spans 32 volumes and 32,640 …If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements. Avoid stating facts as opinions. Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in Wikipedia's voice. For example, Wikipedia:Reliable sources says newspaper articles are generally considered to be reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) recommends against newspaper articles for certain technical purposes. Editors must use their best judgement to decide which advice is most appropriate and relevant to the specific ...
Primary sources may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge. But it's a good idea to quote the Quran and Hadith to explain a topic, if they are cited in reliable secondary sources.The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's relationship to history—covering not just the Bible's acceptability as history but also the ability to understand the literary forms of biblical narrative. One can extend biblical historicity to the evaluation of whether or not the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the …WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - ask about specific sources. However, editors new to a particular topic might not realize some specific major publications are preferred as sources. Guideline WP:MEDRS suggests sources for medical text, but other subjects need recommendations for reliable sources, as well.The short answer is yes, you can . . . but you probably shouldn't. Instead, try to find the original source from where the Wikipedia contributor got their information by looking for in-article citations. If you can find a source, it's a good idea to cite that instead, especially if it's a primary source. If there's no citation, it's time to do ...
As a university student, you are expected to use credible sources in your assessments and course work. A credible source is one that is written by someone who is an expert in their discipline and is free of errors and bias. This guide explains the difference between credible, scholarly and peer-reviewed sources.The five pillars establish Wikipedia as a free online encyclopedia, with articles that are accurate and cite reliable sources, and editors – called Wikipedians – who avoid bias and treat one another with respect. Policies and guidelines build upon the five pillars by establishing best practices for writing and editing on Wikipedia. ….
Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Wikipedia reliable source. Possible cause: Not clear wikipedia reliable source.
Jan 29, 2023 · JSTOR. JSTOR is an online library of all kinds of sources, such as books, articles, and journals. Even though access is limited, it can be a great help for students. It is also considered one of the most reliable databases since the sources are selected very carefully before being placed there. Microsoft Academic. Everyone got up in arms about it not having R-60s in game because "Wikipedia cites a reliable source"; only for someone to dig up a copy of the book and show that it actually stated the Su-7BLK carried no air-to-air missiles (and that the Wikipedia article was citing a false claim to the book). Wikipedia is generally very good.24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently engaged in a spirited debate over whether Fox News is a reliable enough source to use as a citation in ...
History. Founded in 1768, The Encyclopedia Britannica is a general knowledge English-language encyclopedia. It is written by about 100 full-time editors and more than 4,000 contributors, including 110 Nobel Prize winners and five American presidents. The 2010 version of the 15th edition, which spans 32 volumes and 32,640 …The best kind of sources for Wikipedia are reliable, third-party sources (not published by or related to the subject of the article). Wikipedia:Help with sources has more information about these and why they are needed. Unfortunately, the Simple English Wikipedia has many articles which do not have these kinds of sources, or in fact any sources ...Please refer to Wikipedia:reliable source. The Findings cannot be used as a reliable source or reference to this article. Also please familiarise yourself with the discussion about reliable sources, proposals and resolutions which were passed by the first and second arbitration commitee. :: ...
homes for sale 33981 The Ancient History Encyclopedia was founded in 2009 by van der Crabben with the stated goal of improving history education worldwide by creating a freely accessible and reliable history source. The nonprofit organization is based in Godalming , United Kingdom and Montreal , Canada , although it has no office and its team is globally distributed. anglo american alliance definitionwhat are the benefits of studying and understanding other cultures I see no reason against it being a WP:Reliable source. That discussion has nothing to do with this page. Catholic encyclopedia is used all over Wikipedia, so I see no reason why it should be questioned just here. Again, this seems to be raising a higher standard here regarding the Catholic encyclopedia than elsewhere in Wikipedia.A secondary source summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources. In general, Wikipedia articles should rely on reliable secondary sources. A tertiary source is usually a document that summarizes primary, secondary and other tertiary sources. Encyclopedias, including Wikipedia, are tertiary sources. summarize vs paraphrase You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is impossible to fully cover here. You can find more information at Wikipedia:Verifiability and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. se verbcheer open gymmike o'donnell basketball Yes. But only as a reference. Wikipedia is frowned upon. Not really. What you should do is look at their sources and quote those after reading them. i must be missing something bc encyclopedia britannica is a different thing from wikipedia. once upon a time ppl bought TOMES of fact-books for their homes/kids, and encyclopedia britannica is one ... ku post game interview today WW wiki is not a reliable source - Wikipedia Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any ... at the beginning of the season macdonald had to removeabc11 news raleigh ncvulpecula god roll Jasper Jackson. Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group “generally unreliable”. The ...